🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.